TEDS Data Dictionary

TEDS Pilot Studies

Contents of this page:

Introduction

This page briefly describes pilot studies that were carried out for some of the main TEDS studies.

The surviving documentation of pilot studies is highly variable, especially for the older TEDS studies. In some cases, no documentation has been retained and it is unclear what piloting took place within TEDS; this is the case for all studies carried out before twins were aged 7. A summary of known pilot studies, for which at least some documentation exists, is shown in the summary table below.

Pilot studies were generally carried out with the aims of testing novel measures, or of testing adapted or shortened versions of known measures, or of testing novel methods of data collection.

Some pilots involved test and retest in order to assess reliability of the measures. Some test-retest pilots were completed before the start of the main study, usually involving non-TEDS-twin participants. In other cases, a retest was carried out soon after the start of the main study, involving a subset of twins who had finished the activities promptly.

Participants in pilot studies have sometimes included a subset of the TEDS twins and/or their parents; they sometimes included older or younger siblings of the twins; and sometimes they included unrelated samples from various other sources.

This page gives only a tabulated outline (see summary below) of each known or documented pilot study for which at least some records have been retained. Documentation of the measures is not given, except in cases where this can be done in a concise way for retained test-retest datasets, sometimes with reference to the same measures used in the respective main TEDS studies: see the section describing test-retest datasets below.

Datasets were not archived from many of the pilots. In a few cases, as indicated in the summary below, test-retest pilot datasets have been retained as evidence for measurement of reliability testing of measures. Where such datasets have been retained, all participants have been fully anonymised in the data, so participants cannot be linked to other data sources.

Summary of known pilot studies

The table below lists the pilot studies for which at least some minimal documentation remains in TEDS. It briefly describes the types of participants, whether a dataset has been retained within TEDS, and whether the piloted measures were documented in any detail.

As mentioned above, test-retest datasets have been retained where possible and where these have been documented. These datasets are described in somewhat more detail under the heading test-retest datasets, below.

TEDS study Pilot description Participants Dataset retained? Measures documented?
7 Year Steve Petrill's telephone pilot Unknown (but unrelated to TEDS families) no yes: various cognitive tests (not all used in the main study)
Tracks telephone pilot "Tracks" twin families (unrelated to TEDS families) no no
9 Year Telephone pilot TEDS twins no yes: telephone versions of booklet cognitive tests as used in the main study
Booklet pilot "Tracks" twin families (unrelated to TEDS families) plus some older siblings of TEDS twins. no yes: parent, child and teacher booklets similar to those used in the main study
Test-retest booklet pilot Older siblings of TEDS twins (and their parents) plus some "Tracks" twin families (unrelated to TEDS families). yes: 31 parents and children yes: includes a small subset of measures/items used in both the 9 Year and 10 Year studies.
10 Year Lets Go Learn web test pilot TEDS twins no no: this was a pilot of a pre-existing web test administered by the external Lets Go Learn study
John Rogers web test pilot Not recorded no no: this was a pilot of cognitive tests provided by collaborator John Rogers within KCL
PIAT web initial testing Local school sample and some siblings of twins no yes: web test as used in the main study
PIAT web pilot TEDS twins yes: 148 twins, with main study data as "retest" yes: web test as used in the main study
Author Recognition test and Classroom CHAOS pilot See above: included in the "9 Year test-retest booklet pilot"
12 Year Paper booklet pilot TEDS twins no no
Web test pilot Siblings of twins and unrelated friends no no
Paper-based retest TEDS twins yes: 15 twin pairs yes: paper versions of the maths and reading web tests
14 Year Science test pilot Unknown, but unrelated to TEDS families no yes: trial versions of Science questions on paper
TEDS study Pilot description Participants Dataset retained? Measures documented?
16 Year GCSE pilot TEDS twins and parents no yes: asked to specify all types of qualifications that twins would take at age 16
Behaviour booklet pilot TEDS parents and older siblings of twins no yes: measures as used in the main study booklets
Web pilot 1 Local school sample no yes: selection of language and reading tests (paper versions)
Web pilot 2 TEDS parents and older siblings of twins no yes: selection of environment and wellbeing measures (paper versions)
Web pilot 3 TEDS parents and older siblings of twins no yes: Passages test (paper version)
Web pilot 4 Unknown, but unrelated to TEDS families no no, but the pilot involved initial web versions of numerical tests (e.g. dot task, reaction time, PVT)
Web retest TEDS twins yes: 24 twin pairs, with main study data as "test" yes: web versions of the 7 numerical tests, paper versions of 5 cognitive/language tests and of the 4 web environment/wellbeing questionnaires
18 Year Questionnaire pilot TEDS twins and parents no yes: prototype version of the main study questionnaire
Perception web study test-retest pilot TEDS twins yes: 68 twins yes: measures as used in the main study
FFMP web study test-retest pilot Younger siblings of TEDS twins yes: 93 siblings yes: measures as used in the main study
Bricks web study test-retest pilot Younger siblings of TEDS twins yes: 97 siblings yes: measures as used in the main study
Kings Challenge web study pilots Test-retest pilot 1: younger siblings of TEDS twins no no, but it is assumed that this was an earlier version of the test battery
Test-retest pilot 2: older siblings of TEDS twins yes: 117 siblings yes: measures as used in the main study
Navigation web study test-retest pilots Test-retest pilot 1: older siblings of TEDS twins no no, but it is assumed that this was an earlier version of the test battery
Test-retest pilot 2: younger siblings of TEDS twins yes: 45 siblings yes: measures as used in the main study
21 Year TEDS21 questionnaire feasibility pilots 1 and 2 TEDS twins no no, but the pilots are known to have contained wide-ranging candidate measures for TEDS21 phases 1 and 2 respectively
G-game feasibility pilots 1 and 2 TEDS twins no no: these were early versions of the g-game pilot for use in the telephone app (differing in many respects from the measures eventually delivered in the web g-game)
App feasibility studies Students and friends, unrelated to TEDS families no no: early versions of TEDS21 and the g-game were trialled in the app for general feedback rather than for data analysis.
26 Year TEDS26 pilots Subjects recruited by a commercial piloting company no no: selected measures were trialled as candidates for the main twin mental health questionnaire

Test-retest datasets

This section contains brief documentation of the pilot test-retest datasets that have been retained in TEDS. The measures or variables are described. In some cases, where the test and/or retest used the same measures as in the respective main study, they are documented using links to the study pages. In other cases, an annotated documented may be provided. In all cases, the participant IDs have been randomly anonymised, so the datasets cannot be linked to other data sources.

9 Year booklet test-retest dataset

This test-retest study was carried out in February 2004. This was roughly at the end of the main TEDS 9 Year study data collection (for cohort 2) and at the start of the main TEDS 10 Year study data collection (for cohort 1). The purpose of the test-retest study seems to have been partly to check reliability for measures in the 9 Year booklets, and partly to pilot measures for the 10 Year study (see measures listed below).

Participants in the test-retest study, for whom data have been retained, included 24 older siblings of twins, along with their parents; plus 7 children from the unrelated "Tracks" twin sample (one twin per pair), also with their parents.

The test-retest study was administered by post. The initial test booklets (parent and child) were sent with a short deadline for completion; when returned, the retest booklets were sent. The interval between test and retest varied between 2 and 9 days, with a median of 6 days. The measures in the test-retest booklet were:

  • CEQ (Classroom Environment Questionnaire), 28 items, for both parents and children, as used in the 9 Year parent and twin booklets.
  • Behaviour measures, 16 items, for parents only. This was a small subset of the items used in the 9 Year parent booklet (including some CAST, anxiety and SDQ items).
  • Classroom CHAOS measure, 16 items, for children only. This measure was not used in the 9 Year study, but was used in the 10 Year teacher questionnaire.
  • Author and Book Recognition test, 45 items, for children only. This measure was not used in the 9 Year study, but a modified version was used in the 10 Year twin web study.

It appears that the child "story" written task (as used in the 9 Year twin booklet) was also included in the test-retest study. However, neither data nor documentation have been preserved for this part of the test-retest study.

The measures are documented in a list of variables in the 9 year test-retest dataset (pdf).

10 Year PIAT pilot and test-retest dataset

Before the start of the 10 Year study, the PIAT web test, which had a novel presentation with branching and discontinue rules, was piloted. The final pilot involved a set of TEDS twin pairs, from cohort 1. This pilot was carried out between November 2003 and January 2004. It used essentially the same web version of the PIAT version as was subsequently used in the 10 Year study.

After piloting, the main 10 Year web study, including the PIAT alongside other tests, went ahead with all cohort 1 twins being invited. 148 of the twins who had completed the pilot went on to complete the main study as well. These 148 twins are the cases in the test-retest dataset; the "test" being the pilot, and the "retest" being the PIAT test in the main study.

Most cohort 1 twins took part in the 10 Year web test between June and August 2004. The interval between test and retest varied between 165 and 294 days, with a median of 237 days (roughly 8 months).

The variables in the retest are as documented in the 10 Year PIAT study page. The variables in the pilot test have the same numbering (19 to 100 for the main test items) but slightly different names; the "j" prefix is omitted, and suffixes "resp" (response) and "scor" (score) are used for the items.

12 Year paper retest dataset

Retests were carried out for 15 twin pairs who had completed the web tests promptly, after the start of cohort 1 testing, in April 2006. The 15 families were asked to visit the TEDS office, where the activities were carried out on paper. The test-retest interval varied from 26 to 98 days and its median was 65 days; it is measured with a variable in the dataset.

The measures retested are documented in a description of the 12 year paper retest activities (pdf). The activities retested were as follows:

  • PIAT: 81 items, numbered 19-100, as in the original web test. Retest variable names (item scores) are pi19 through to pi100 and total score pitot.
  • GOAL: 60 items. This included all items from the original test booklet, not just the 36 items that were in the original web test. Retest variable names (item scores) are go01 through to go60 and total score gotot.
  • Yes-No (reading fluency): 98 items, as in the original web test. Retest variable names (item scores) are rf01 through to rf98 and total score rftot.
  • Author recognition: 42 items as in the original web test. Item variables have not been retained in the retest data, just the scores artot (number of correct author names minus number of incorrect author names selected), authcor (number of correct authors selected) and authwr (number of incorrect authors selected).
  • Maths test: 70 items. This included two sets of questions, labelled A and B, with 32 and 38 items respectively. These questions were taken from original test booklets, not just the subset of items that were in the original web test. Retest variable names (item scores) are mta01 through to mta32 and mtb01 through to mtb38. Retest score variables are mtatot (0-32), mtbtot (0-38) and mttot (0-70).

The dataset includes the retest variables as listed above, alongside the item and test scores from the corresponding original 12 Year web tests (with variable names as documented in the 12 Year study).

16 Year "validation study" retest dataset

Retests were carried out for 24 twin pairs who had completed the main tests promptly, after the start of cohort 1 testing, in November 2010. The 24 families were asked to visit the TEDS office, where the tests were carried out. The test-retest interval, which is a variable in the dataset, varied between 12 and 50 days, with a median of 27 days.

The testing involved repeating the activities already completed in the web study. Some repeat tests were done on paper and some using the web instrument. The retest measures were exactly the same as the original measures, except that some were reformatted for paper testing. Timing and administration of the paper tests were supervised by TEDS staff. The tests repeated on paper were:

  • Ravens Matrices
  • Mill Hill Vocabulary
  • Expressions (Figurative Language)
  • Passages
  • Yes/No
  • Environment and Wellbeing questionnaires A, B, C and D

The tests repeated via the web were:

  • Understanding Number
  • Dot Number
  • Number Sense (Dot Task)
  • Number Line
  • PVT
  • Corsi Block
  • Reaction Times

The measures and variables are described in detail in the 16 Year study pages. Item variables have the same names as in the main 16 Year dataset. The retest variable names have been given the prefix "v" (validation) to distinguish them from the main test study variables, but are otherwise identical.

18 Year web studies retest datasets

There were five post-18 year web studies: Perception, Bricks, FFMP, Kings Challenge and Navigation (see 18 Year study). In each of these studies, the test activities were piloted with a test-retest study. For the Perception study, the retest was carried out after the start of the main study, using a sample of twins. For the other studies, test-retest pilots were carried out shortly before the start of the main twin study, using samples of siblings of the twins. In each case, test and retest were administered via the web on the TEDS web server; the test and retest data were downloaded from the web server and were used to build the datasets.

The pilot activities are not documented in detail, but they are assumed to have been essentially the same as the main twin study activities (see 18 year web activities page). The variable names are closely matched to, or at least analagous to, the documented variable names in the main twin datasets. In the SPSS test-retest datasets, the variables are also identified with labels. In each dataset, retest variables have the same names as test variable, with the addition of "R" (retest) as a prefix or suffix. Each dataset also has a variable named "testretestinterval" (or similar) measuring the number of days between test and retest for each participant.

The table below summarises essential details of each test-retest study dataset.

Study Date of test-retest Participants, N in dataset Test-retest interval
Perception June to August 2013 68 twins (retested after main test),
some paired and some unpaired
7 to 47 days, median 14 days
Bricks November 2014 97 younger siblings of twins 2 to 13 days, median 7 days
FFMP (Fashion, Food and Music Preferences) February 2015 93 younger siblings of twins 0 to 11 days, median 5 days
Kings Challenge April 2015 117 older siblings of twins 4 to 13 days, median 7 days
Navigation August 2015 45 younger sibs of twins 24 to 39 days, median 31 days